For today’s Christian leader, burnout is not just an issue of too many jobs and not enough time, says Dr Adekunle Adenipekun. In a world certainty is rewarded over discernment and volume over wisdom, here’s how to avoid the pitfalls of collapse or control

Christian leadership has never been a casual assignment. Yet in recent years, many pastors have found themselves leading in a climate that feels uniquely demanding. It is not only the weight of preaching, pastoral care, administration and crisis response. It is also the emotional labour of navigating polarised conversations, digital outrage and public pressure to take a quick position on complex issues.
The strain is not always visible at first. It often begins quietly. A growing tiredness that sleep does not fix. A narrowing of compassion. A subtle fear of saying the wrong thing. A sense that every decision is being scrutinised and every silence interpreted. Over time, this can produce burnout, not simply as exhaustion, but as moral and spiritual fatigue.
Burnout in ministry is rarely just a time-management problem. It is frequently a soul issue. It can involve prolonged stress, compassion fatigue, isolation, and what many now describe as moral injury. This occurs when someone is pressured to act against their conscience, or when they repeatedly witness harm, conflict or injustice without the power or space to address it. Leaders begin to feel trapped between competing demands, and their inner margins slowly disappear.
The question is how to remain whole while serving faithfully. Sustainable leadership is not a modern preference. It is a biblical necessity.
An outrageous cycle
Outrage is not just something happening ‘out there’ in wider society; it has become an atmosphere in which Christian leadership happens. Outrage moves fast. It demands immediate responses and punishes nuance. It often rewards certainty over discernment, volume over wisdom, and loyalty to a side over loyalty to Christ.
This is not to say that leaders should avoid difficult conversations or prophetic witness. Rather, the manner and timing of our speech should be governed by Christ’s formation in us, not by the urgency of the outrage cycle.
When the Church becomes harsh, reactive and fearful, it may gain attention, but it loses trust
Even within the church, leaders can feel pressured to perform confidence when what is required is prayerful thoughtfulness. Congregations often carry the anxieties of the wider culture into worship spaces, and pastors become emotional shock absorbers for fear, frustration and competing expectations.
In the UK, this can be intensified by the complexity of multicultural congregations, differing political instincts and a growing suspicion of religious authority. Leaders are expected to speak clearly while navigating tensions they did not create.
In such environments, two unhealthy patterns often emerge.
The first is control. A leader becomes rigid, defensive, and reactive. They begin to treat dissent as disloyalty. They reduce leadership to managing perceptions and policing conversations. This may look like strength, but it is often anxiety dressed as authority.
The second is collapse. Leaders withdraw emotionally, lose joy and operate on autopilot. They keep functioning outwardly, but inwardly they are running on empty. They become present in meetings but absent in spirit.
A pastor once described it this way: “I stopped seeing people as people. Every conversation became a risk assessment. Will this person leave? Will they complain? Will they post about me online? I wasn’t shepherding souls anymore. I was managing threats.”
Neither pattern is sustainable. Both are signals that leadership has lost its centre.
Faithful formation
If we want a model of leadership that lasts, we must return to Jesus, not simply as our message, but as our pattern. Christ’s ministry was deeply public and deeply disruptive. Yet he consistently refused to be captured by the power dynamics of the day.
In Luke 4:5–8, Jesus is tempted with influence and control - and rejects it. He refuses to gain authority through compromised worship. In John 6:15, when people seek to make him king, he withdraws. Jesus does not build his mission by harnessing the crowd’s political appetite. His authority is not dependent on public approval.
Healthy boundaries teach congregations that sustainable ministry serves them better than heroic exhaustion
This is crucial. Many leaders burn out by seeking security in the wrong places. Some seek security through applause. Others through control. Others through a relentless need to be seen as right. Yet Jesus models a different centre. His leadership flows from communion with the Father. His public actions are anchored in private formation.
When Christian leaders lose this centre, ministry can become a stage for survival rather than a calling for service. Leaders begin to chase relevance. They begin to lead from fear. They become reactive rather than reflective. Over time, the soul pays the price.
A leader can gain influence quickly in an outrage-driven environment. But influence that is not rooted in Christlike formation often produces long-term fragility.
The good neighbour
When faith becomes mixed up with fear, it often produces tribal thinking. People begin to define neighbourliness by similarity: those who look like us, think like us, vote like us, worship like us. Yet Jesus disrupts this instinct in one of his most famous teachings.
In Luke 10:25–37, a lawyer asks: “Who is my neighbour?” Jesus answers by describing a man left wounded on the road, ignored by religious representatives, and helped by a Samaritan. The Samaritan becomes a neighbour through costly compassion.
This parable is not only a moral lesson. It is leadership formation. Jesus is shaping how his followers relate to the vulnerable, the outsider, and the person their community has taught them to fear. The Samaritan does not merely feel compassion. He acts. He protects the wounded man’s dignity. He pays the cost. He stays engaged.
This is a leadership model that cannot coexist with dehumanisation or spiritual performance. It forces the Church to ask a hard question: Are we leading people toward neighbourly love, or toward ideological loyalty?
When leaders embrace Jesus’ framework, something shifts. They resist the urge to lead from contempt. They refuse to treat people as problems. They choose compassion without losing clarity. They become steadier. And steady leaders last longer.
Strong and sustainable
Many church leaders carry an unspoken belief that rest is a distraction from faithfulness. Yet Jesus did not model constant output, but rhythm.
Mark 1:35 shows Jesus rising early to pray, prioritising communion with the Father. Mark 6:31 records him telling his disciples to come away and rest. These moments were not interruptions to ministry, but part of the architecture of sustainable mission.
Ministry does not become more spiritual when it becomes more frantic. Sustainability is stewardship. If a leader’s body, mind, and spirit are the vessel through which ministry flows, then neglecting the vessel is not maturity. It is vulnerability.
This is why sustainable leadership must include practices that protect what matters most: prayer, sleep, healthy boundaries, friendships, exercise, family attention, and spaces of silence. These are not optional extras for those who have time. They are disciplines for those who want to finish well. Prayer roots us in our identity as beloved children before we are anything else. Healthy boundaries teach congregations that sustainable ministry serves them better than heroic exhaustion.
In an age where leadership is often measured by how loudly one speaks, restraint may be one of the most prophetic forms of authority
Many leaders assume that courage means constant confrontation. Yet Jesus reveals another kind of strength: restraint. He spoke truth, but he did not take every bait. He confronted hypocrisy but also refused to become a puppet of public expectation.
Restraint is not cowardice. It is wisdom. It is the capacity to remain governed by Christ rather than by emotion. In an age where leadership is often measured by how loudly one speaks, restraint may be one of the most prophetic forms of authority.
Humility also matters. The leaders who last are not those who pretend to be invincible. They are those who remain teachable, accountable and honest about limitations. They understand that leadership is shared work. Delegation is not weakness. It is healthy body life. Accountability is not distrust. It is protection.
Jesus at the centre
The Church’s credibility is shaped by more than its statements. It is shaped by the health of its leaders and the spirit of its communities. When the Church becomes harsh, reactive and fearful, it may gain attention, but it loses trust. When the Church becomes compassionate, truthful, and steady, it reflects Christ, even when it is misunderstood.
We need leaders who can carry tension without being consumed by it. Who can resist being co-opted by outrage and instead model the slow, costly work of neighbourly love. We need leaders whose authority is rooted in Christlike character rather than public performance.
Leading without burnout in an age of outrage requires more than resilience techniques. It requires a return to Jesus as model, not merely as message. His way was grounded, prayerful, and compassionate. His leadership refused domination and embraced service. His rhythm included withdrawal, rest and renewal.
The centre is Christ. And from that centre, we can survive not for a season but lead for a lifetime in faithful service.











No comments yet